  
            
            
            Publicly-traded
              company listed on both the New York Stock Exchange (LDW) and
              Montreal and Toronto exchanges (LDM). 
            
            L1 KEY LINES OF BUSINESS 
            
            Transportation
              management services. School bus and public transportation.
              Ambulance services and hospital emergency room management. Retains
              a substantial interest in Laidlaw Environmental Services, a
              hazardous waste and trash disposal firm.  
            
            L2 OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS 
            
            Officers:
              Peter N. T. Widdrington* (Chairman), James R. Bullock* (President
              and CEO), Leslie W. Haworth* (Vice-President and CFO), John R.
              Grainger* (Executive Vice-President and COO of Laidlaw Transit),
              Ivan R. Cairns* (Senior Vice-President and General Counsel),
              George B. DeHuff (CEO of American Medical Response), Kenneth W.
              Winger (CEO of Laidlaw Environmental Services), Jeffery Cassell
              (Vice-President, Risk Management), Thomas A. G. Watson
              (Vice-President, Communications), William R. Cottick (Associate
              General Counsel), Debbie Block (Manager, Human Resources).
              Asterisk indicates that individual is also on the firm's board of
              directors. 
            
            Directors:
              William P. Cooper (President and CEO, Cooper Corporation), Jack P.
              Edwards (President and CEO, Danzas Corporation), William A.
              Farlinger (Chairman, Ontario Hydro), Donald M. Green (Chairman,
              ACD Tridon Inc.), Martha O. Hesse (President, Hesse Gas Company),
              Gordon R. Ritchie (CEO, Strategico Inc.), Stella M. Thompson
              (President, Governance West Inc.). 
            
            C1 MULTI-YEAR STOCK AND EPS TRENDS 
            
              
                 | 
                1998 | 
                1997 | 
                1996 | 
                1995 | 
                1994 | 
               
              
                 | 
                 | 
                (fiscal
                year ending in August) | 
                 | 
               
              
                | Earnings
                per share | 
                $0.97
                (est) | 
                
                $0.14 | 
                $0.40 | 
                
                $0.27 | 
                n/a | 
               
              
                | Stock
                price high  | 
                16.50
                (est) | 
                16.50 | 
                11.00 | 
                10.13 | 
                8.38 | 
               
              
                | Stock
                price low  | 
                8.60
                (est) | 
                14.38 | 
                8.25 | 
                7.00 | 
                5.38 | 
               
              
                | Stock
                price close | 
                
                8.60 (est) | 
                14.63 | 
                9.63 | 
                9.00 | 
                8.13 | 
               
             
            
            C2/C3 DIRECTOR/MANAGEMENT OWNERSHIP AND FIVE
              PERCENT OWNERS  
            
            Insiders:
              Own less than 1% of outstanding equity. 
            
            5%
              Shareholders: No individuals. Canadian Pacific owns 17% of the
              company. 
            
            C4 BUSINESS SEGMENT REVENUES 
            
              
                 | 
                1998 | 
                1997 | 
               
              
                 | 
                (Millions
                of $) | 
               
              
                | Passenger
                services | 
                $1,646.3 | 
                $1,363.5 | 
               
              
                | Healthcare
                services | 
                $1,659.1 | 
                $957.2 | 
               
              
                | Subtotal | 
                $3,305.4 | 
                $2,320.7 | 
               
              
                | Hazardous
                waste services | 
                $384.8 | 
                $710.0 | 
               
              
                | Total
                revenues | 
                $3,690.2 | 
                3,030.7 | 
               
             
            
            (Note:
              figures for year ending August 31) 
            
            T1 KEY OPERATING DATA 
            
            Employees:
              79,500 1-year employee growth: 20.6% 
            
              
                | Growth
                Rates: | 
                1-year | 
                3-year | 
                
                5-year | 
               
              
                | Sales
                %  | 
                32.00 | 
                30.04 | 
                9.49 | 
               
              
                | EPS% | 
                -64.57 | 
                -6.77 | 
                -22.91 | 
               
              
                | Dividend% | 
                5.26 | 
                7.72 | 
                4.56 | 
               
               
              
            
              
                 | 
                1997 | 
                1996 | 
                1995 | 
               
              
                 | 
                 | 
                ($
                millions) | 
                 | 
               
              
                | Revenue | 
                3,031 | 
                2,296 | 
                1,722 | 
               
              
                | Operating
                expenses | 
                3,067 | 
                2,063 | 
                1,548 | 
               
              
                | Operating
                income | 
                -366 | 
                233 | 
                175 | 
               
              
                | After-tax
                income | 
                -19 | 
                117 | 
                75 | 
               
              
                | Capital
                expenditures and other investing | 
                -615 | 
                -707 | 
                -694 | 
               
              
              
            
              
                | Comparative
                data:  | 
                Laidlaw | 
                
                Industry  
                 Average | 
                Sector  
                 Average | 
               
              
                | Operating
                margin (5-year ave) | 
                2.89 | 
                6.47 | 
                13.27 | 
               
              
                | Net
                profit margin (5-year ave) | 
                -0.45 | 
                2.57 | 
                6.19 | 
               
              
                | Return
                on assets (TTM) | 
                5.43 | 
                6.12 | 
                5.29 | 
               
              
                | Return of assets (5-year ave) | 
                -0.49 | 
                5.88 | 
                4.16 | 
               
              
                | Return
                on investment (TTM) | 
                6.04 | 
                10.41 | 
                7.17 | 
               
              
                | Return
                of investment (5-year ave.) | 
                -0.54 | 
                12.61 | 
                5.35 | 
               
              
                | Return
                on equity (TTM) | 
                12.17 | 
                14.58 | 
                14.90 | 
               
              
                | Return
                of equity (5-year ave) | 
                -0.23 | 
                17.24 | 
                12.85 | 
               
             
            
            (Note: TTM
              = trailing twelve month) 
            
            T2 KEY CAPITAL STRUCTURE DATA 
            
            Market
              capitalization (millions of $): 3,008.37 
            
              
                 | 
                1998  
                 (2nd qtr.) | 
                1997 | 
                1996 | 
                1995 | 
               
              
                 | 
                 | 
                ($
                millions) | 
                 | 
               
              
                | Long-term
                debt and capital leases | 
                2,751 | 
                2,192 | 
                2,041 | 
                1,666 | 
               
              
                | Total
                liabilities | 
                3,900 | 
                3,323 | 
                2,796 | 
                2,437 | 
               
              
                | Total
                equity | 
                2,751 | 
                2,794 | 
                2,137 | 
                1,697 | 
               
              
              
            
              
                | Comparative
                data: | 
                Laidlaw | 
                
                Industry average | 
               
              
                | Total
                debt to equity (%) :  | 
                0.96 | 
                0.69 | 
               
             
            
            (Most
              recent quarter) 
            
            COMPANY HISTORY 
            
            Originally
              a small, Ontario-based trucking firm, Laidlaw was acquired in 1959
              by Belgian entrepreneur Michael DeGroote for $300,000. DeGroote
              employed an aggressive acquisitions strategy over the next two
              decades to transform the company into a multifaceted
              transportation services firm. Though the firm remained based in
              Canada, most of its business is now in the United States. DeGroote
              took Laidlaw public in 1969, and in 1988 sold out his interests in
              the firm to Canadian Pacific for $500 million. By this point,
              Laidlaw had wide-ranging interests in solid waste disposal, the
              school bus industry, public transit, and chemical and hazardous
              waste management. In the 1990s, Laidlaw has been transformed yet
              again by current CEO James Bullock, who has continued to use
              aggressive acquisitions and major divestitures to refocus the 
              company less on waste management, which failed to provide
              consistent earnings growth, and more on bus transportation (school
              and municipal), ambulance services, and emergency room management.
              The continuing sale of businesses in the stagnant waste services
              industry has generated significant cash reserves. In 1997, that
              allowed Laidlaw to acquire 10 separate businesses for $1.9
              billion, including American Medical Response, the largest private
              U.S. ambulance service, and EmCare, the largest private operator
              of U.S. hospital emergency rooms. By October 1988, when it
              proposed acquisition of Greyhound Lines Inc. for $470 million,
              Laidlaw was already the largest North American provider of
              ambulances, municipal transportation fleets, and school bus
              services. 
            
            In many of
              its U.S. and Canadian acquisitions, Laidlaw has employed a
              low-cost financing scheme which involves the use of a Laidlaw
              subsidiary based in a European tax haven. (Perhaps half of the
              Canadian companies that have U.S. subsidiaries have employed the
              same device; many European firms have as well, though to a lesser
              extent.) The IRS argues that this arrangement exceeded acceptable
              norms for deductible lending, and that Laidlaw took unjustifiable
              tax breaks. Laidlaw contests the claim. CEO Bullock estimates that
              if the IRS's view prevails in Tax Court, the company might easily
              owe as much as $500 million in additional U.S. taxes. Investor
              uncertainty over this issue has driven Laidlaw's stock price down
              by nearly 40% in the past year. 
            
            KEY FACTS ABOUT THE COMPANY 
            
              - 
                Provides school bus transportation for 1,940,000 students per
                day. Has more than 25% of the market for privately-run school
                buses. Nearly 80% of the firm's school bus revenues are
                generated in the U.S. 
 
              -  Provides
                bus services to 205 municipal transit systems in 45 states
                (including Los Angeles, Chicago and Seattle). 
 
              -  Bus
                operations include fixed-rate transit, daily scheduled services,
                parcel express, and private tour packages. Also the largest
                operator of "paratransit" services to elderly and
                physically and mentally-handicapped passengers in the U.S.
                
 
              -  The
                second largest provider of health care transportation services
                in the U.S., operating from 71 locations in 23 states. Provides
                service to more than 5 million people annually. Healthcare
                transportation services include emergency ambulance operations,
                emergency response services, and nonemergency medical transport.
                About half of U.S. ambulance operations are privately-run. In
                1997, Laidlaw had about 15% of that market. Of the approximately
                5200 emergency hospital rooms in the U.S., only about 20% are
                privately managed. Laidlaw is already the leading private
                operator in this market. 
 
              - 
                Privatization of public services (school bus and ambulance
                operations) has been a principal source of Laidlaw's revenue
                growth over the past five years, though it has often come
                through the acquisition of firms that had existing public
                contracts -- such as Mayflower Contract Services, which operated
                more than 7500 school buses in the Midwest. 
 
              - 
                Continuing interests in solid waste include operations in 26
                states and 7 Canadian provinces. Owns 35% of Safety-Kleen, a
                hazardous and industrial waste management firm. Laidlaw has been
                attempting to abandon simple trash hauling, a low margin
                business, in favor of integrated waste operations in which the
                firm additionally controls the dump or recycling process.
                
 
              -  Target
                of $5 billion in annual revenues by 2000. Operating earnings
                growth continues in excess of 20% per annum. 
 
              - 
                Relatively poor financial performance and depressed equity
                values are attributable in part to the debt overload that has
                resulted from the company's policy of continuing acquisitions,
                restructuring charges, currency exchange losses, and the
                uncertainty over the ultimate disposition of the company's
                dispute with the IRS over interest deductions, which has led the
                company to build up a cash reserve in excess of $200 million.
                
 
             
            
            EDUCATION INVOLVEMENT 
            
            Laidlaw's
              early growth in the school bus market was achieved primarily
              through acquisitions of existing companies. More recently, it has
              shifted its focus to the conversion of existing public systems to
              private ownership. Much of Laidlaw's recent growth is the result
              of the determination of local school boards to save money by
              privatizing bus operations. The company argues that it can reduce
              bus transportation costs by 10-20% through a combination of lower
              wages and efficiencies gained through size (lower costs for
              replacement parts, say, or cheaper insurance rates). Laidlaw's
              size permits it to maintain relatively newer buses than many
              public systems can afford, and the company claims that it enjoys a
              better safety record (measured in the form of accidents per
              100,000 miles) than a typical public school system. 
            This
              Profile was prepared by the Center for Economic Organizing,
              Washington, DC, for the National Education Association Educational
              Support Personnel Information System (ESPIS). ESPIS is a
              collaborative project of NEA Affiliate Capacity Building and NEA
              Research.  |